Free Essay: Henry Tam and the MGI Team Case – Main Managerial Problem On the surface, the seven-member MGI team which comprised of Henry Tam and. The case study is about the process of team working and processes to be followed to understand your peers and constructively work with them. Case Questions: Henry Tam and the MGI Team 1. a) What is your evaluation of the MGI s team processes? b) What were the root causes of the problems?.

Author: Kazragrel Faushura
Country: Turks & Caicos Islands
Language: English (Spanish)
Genre: Literature
Published (Last): 5 November 2007
Pages: 212
PDF File Size: 8.42 Mb
ePub File Size: 18.58 Mb
ISBN: 480-1-63959-267-1
Downloads: 65800
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
Uploader: Dojin

Yet, the question remains — how can Henry help MGI be successful with so many varied challenges? How about receiving a customized one?

Henry Tam and the Mgi Team | Essay Writing Service A+

They believe the problem was that Sasha did not focus on sales, but rather production and fund raising efforts. Conflict builds as the team generates a range of ideas about how to market their product, but has trouble agreeing on which ideas to pursue.

Lately, Henry thinks of his group as a diverse group of individuals; he was learning a lot about these people and how they could contribute to his team if they come collectively.

We use cookies to give you the best taem possible. Mfi, I am Sara from Studymoose Hi there, would you like to get such a paper? In evaluating the case, it is evident the group has not made effective progress pg. The MGI team had great qualifications to be an effective team.

One of the many components of the professional world is collaborative effort. Sorry, but full essay samples are available only for registered users Choose a Membership Plan. He needs a clear understanding of the stages of group development. Group members took on larger roles than they could handle, as evidenced by Henry and Dana when they struggled to finish their workload.

  KIDOSAKI HOUSE PDF

By clicking “SEND” below, henr agree to our terms of service and privacy policy. Once again, the team engaged a strength aspect of empathizing, supporting, and harmonizing among the team. In our opinion, we think the team members did a good job of understanding and sharing their opinions or ideas to each others. How about receiving a customized one? The team may be able to develop a business plan that garners a degree of support from outside funding, but without the vital knowledge to break into the highly competitive entertainment market, the effort will likely go unrewarded.

This close knit group of friends can cause issues in the workplace, but with the founders being close friends they all approached their business with the same level of seriousness and dedication.

Aggressive culture also creates an environment where some members are not able to contribute their ideas. Creating the environment of understanding and bringing each other into harmony will make the team members more energetic and comfortable in their work. Members are interested in getting to know each other and discovering what is considered accepted behavior in determining the real task of the group, ahd in determining group rules pg.

Henry could have broken that faultline by splitting the casw he belonged to and being creative with other members.

The clinicians and business office types formed two sub-groups which represented their separate interests. While Dav, commented that the program needed technological help, the design of the software game was excellent.

Henry does a lot of market research and believes the product should be marketed to teachers and education market.

Establish a clear team leader with the capacity to influence tsam members that will develop credibility within the team. Establish Meeting Agendas to maintain goal focus Rationale: MGI had collaborators from many different backgrounds that provided many of the expertises and skill sets that they needed.

  KAHLES AH PDF

Henry Tam/MGI Case

At the end of the case, based on your potential solutions, which action would you recommend and why? Without a leader, the team struggled with developing credibility tesm influence among team members and establishing a motivating vision. The team leader would help maximize the group effort by dividing tasks accordingly, delegating fam and coordinating team communication.

Sasha, probably of his self interest to join the MIT business plan contest invited Dav without the prior consent of the team.

Henry and Dana recognized thr lack of leadership in the group almost immediately. According to Dav, Sasha is stubborn while Roman is less stubborn and gives reluctantly.

Henry Tam and the Mgi Team Length: Based on my experience, this is a person who can:. Menu Skip to content.

An Analysis of Henry Tam and the MGI Team

An important recommendation for Henry would include establishing expectations and boundaries for the group. I have presented at several conferences providing insight into human resources policies and procedures, conflict resolution, and good management practices. At the introduction of the case, Henry is described as a devoted, hard-working student. Their henru was meeting the immediate requirements of the HBS business plan contest.

At the end of the case, what actions could Henry take? This would be an individual who would ensure: Hostility and infighting may occur, and the group typically experiences many changes. Stuck in the formative stages of group development, it has yet to mature into an effective team.

Dana agrees with this perspective. The performing stage was unsuccessful because the team did not achieve their goal of finishing their task on time.